HALO-SI from QSI. Planned capability. In development.

HALO-SI from QSI: program workflow map

From the first requirement to the day a product is retired, a program manager carries a lot: people, documents, schedules, funding and contracts. This map walks through the life of a program in 10 phases. Tap any phase to see what the program manager does and what HALO-SI from QSI is designed to help with. People review every output. Your team keeps the final say.

The 10 phases

Tap a phase. Concept shown. Fictional data.

Across all phases

HALO-SI from QSI is designed to draft briefs and summary charts from current program data in your own template, with each number linked to its source and dated. It is designed to keep a record of who changed what and when. People review every output.

The embedded specialist

Engagements include a dedicated QSI data management and SI specialist, as set out in each signed agreement. The specialist:

  • Builds your program's knowledge management database: gathers documents, organizes them by phase, contract and decision, and keeps them current.
  • Tailors HALO-SI from QSI to how your team works: templates, brief formats, schedule imports and stakeholder lists.
  • Trains your team and checks data quality.

The specialist does not make program decisions. Your team keeps the final say.

How the parts connect

  1. Inputs: program documents, Microsoft Project schedules, contract deliverable lists, funding plans, and notes from reviews and tests.
  2. Knowledge base: stores everything with source links and dates.
  3. Pathway guidance: milestones and decision points built from public acquisition guidance, dated, and reviewed for updates.
  4. Trackers: schedule, funding, contract, stakeholder, and reviews, decisions and action items.
  5. Outputs: dashboards and draft briefs for people to review and approve before anything is shared.

A day in the life (Illustrative example)

Before

  • The morning goes to chasing the latest numbers by email.
  • Much of the day goes to rebuilding slides for the weekly brief, and numbers may not match across decks.
  • Schedule changes are typed into the master schedule by hand.
  • Late deliverables are noticed late.
  • Decisions sit in scattered notes.

After (planned capability)

  • One dashboard shows cost, schedule and performance, with flags for late or missing items.
  • A draft weekly brief is built from current data, then reviewed and edited.
  • The contractor's Microsoft Project file is imported, and the PM reviews what moved and what it affects before accepting it.
  • Late or missing deliverables are flagged for the team.
  • Reviews, decisions and action items are logged in one place.
  • More time goes to managing the program and the people.